skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Friday, March 14, 2008
Seriously, awwwww.
Today's New York Times featured this A1 photo of Baby Barack:
UPDATE:
In the interest of equal time, here's the first thing, I kid you negative, that came up when I Googled "baby" and "hillary":
1 comment:
Anonymous said...
Is it me, or does Obama have a huge forehead in that photo?
March 16, 2008 at 5:35 PM
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ask Porkchop
Blog Archive
▼
2008
(111)
►
November
(1)
►
September
(10)
►
August
(11)
►
July
(5)
►
June
(6)
►
May
(2)
►
April
(12)
▼
March
(31)
What's Elvish for "duh"?
Regularly scheduled program
Learn words, donate food
Eeeeewwwwwww.
The nature of genius (or, sorry about all this)
We've been called worse
Heavy reading
Great job, guys
Wanna waste a lot of time?
Hungry for "hay-soos"?
Really, really tapping the Rockies
Next, they'll go after rainbows and Care Bears
Assume la posiciĆ³n
Really?
Seriously, awwwww.
3.14 bottles of fluff on the wall
Erin, don't go "Bragh."
Re-Re-Real estate news
Assisted political suicide
Moving on the wire today
Things I thought I'd never see
Gnome, Sweet Gnome
Oh, by the way...
Or use all three to make stew!
Madness vs. "Madness": There's a vas deferens
A PR campaign I can get behind
Don't Want Those Suckers to Croak ...
Even the 20-sided die.
A tooth for an eye?
Violating Serious Labor Laws
God bless I Camera
►
February
(22)
►
January
(11)
►
2007
(169)
►
December
(8)
►
November
(15)
►
October
(18)
►
September
(14)
►
August
(25)
►
July
(16)
►
June
(19)
►
May
(26)
►
April
(25)
►
March
(3)
Contributors
Brian
Dena Rosenberry
Melissa Cassutt
Paul Asay
1 comment:
Is it me, or does Obama have a huge forehead in that photo?
Post a Comment